UK Decay Forum Index UK Decay
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Ranting and Complaints department.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic    UK Decay Forum Index -> In The UK Decay Today!
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 7:46 pm    Post subject: the pen is mightier than the sword Reply with quote

"Man is the religious animal. He is the only religious animal. He is the only animal that has the True Religion –- several of them. He is the only animal that loves his neighbor as himself and cuts his throat, if his theology isn't straight. He has made a graveyard of the globe in trying his honest best to smooth his brother's path to happiness and heaven."
-- Mark Twain
Do you want to see what all the fuss is about?
ENJOY before these are deleted by the cartoon police.(on this site)
hitler and stalin removed or destroyed all "corrupt art" and replaced it with their own propaganda.
for a historical perspective....
and the following mild little numbers that have upset so many delicate souls that they just had to get the kalashnikovs out to play with>>>
for the real deal>>>
And just for fun and variety>>>,,2-2021728,00.html,,17129-2021010,00.html,,17129-2020243,00.html
Back to top

PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

"When "I" and "You" are absent, I've no idea if this is a mosque, synagogue, church or temple". Mahmud Sahbistari
Back to top

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:11 am    Post subject: 9/11 in focus Reply with quote

There seems an element of ‘Islam phobia’ echoing in some on the earlier comments on this topic but as I noticed that it was named ‘Ranting’ I thought I would add my ‘tupenceworth’.
So here is an interesting breaking story in the USA that could blow the socks of the myth’s surrounding the post 9/11 world

On Monday, the story was published on Yahoo News. It's easy to say that the academics involved are just a bunch of liberals, but that simply isn't the case. Some are lefties, but they are mostly political moderates. They have been radicalized by what they have discovered. They are not really promoting a political agenda, but rather demanding an investigation of what increasingly seems to have been not simply official incompetence that led to mass murder, but an actual offical locomotion behind this murder.
That there was official incompetence is now generally accepted. That was even the conclusion of the 911 Commission. But this goes beyond that.
These experts suggest these events may have been orchestrated by elements within the administration to manipulate Americans into supporting policies at home and abroad they would never have condoned absent "another Pearl Harbor."
They have discovered that The 9/11 Commission Report is replete with omissions, distortions, and factual errors, which David Ray Griffin has documented in his book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions. The official report, for example, entirely ignores the collapse of WTC7, a 47-story building, which was hit by no airplanes, was only damaged by a few small fires, and fell seven hours after the attack.
Here are some of the kinds of considerations that these experts and scholar find profoundly troubling:
* In the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or since 9/11, so how can fires have brought down three in one day? How is this possible?
* The BBC has reported that at least five of the nineteen alleged "hijackers" have turned up alive and well living in Saudi Arabia, yet according to the FBI, they were among those killed in the attacks. How is this possible?
* Frank DeMartini, a project manager for the WTC, said the buildings were designed with load redistribution capabilities to withstand the impact of airliners, whose effects would be like "puncturing mosquito netting with a pencil." Yet they completely collapsed. How is this possible?
* Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700*F, the temperature of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800*F under optimal conditions, and UL certified the steel used to 2,000*F for six hours, the buildings cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires. How is this possible?
* Flight 77, which allegedly hit the building, left the radar screen in the vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to "reappear" in very close proximity to the Pentagon shortly before impact. How is this possible?
* Foreign "terrorists" who were clever enough to coordinate hijacking four commercial airliners seemingly did not know that the least damage to the Pentagon would be done by hitting its west wing. How is this possible?
* Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, in an underground bunker at the White House, watched Vice President Cheney castigate a young officer for asking, as the plane drew closer and closer to the Pentagon, "Do the orders still stand?" The order cannot have been to shoot it down, but must have been the opposite. How is this possible?
* A former Inspector General for the Air Force has observed that Flight 93, which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, should have left debris scattered over an area less than the size of a city block; but it is scattered over an area of about eight square miles. How is this possible?
* A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers on duty on 9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small pieces, and distributed in assorted places to insure its total destruction. How is this possible?
* The Pentagon conducted a training exercise called "MASCAL" simulating the crash of a Boeing 757 into the building on 24 October 2000, and yet Condoleezza Rice, among others, has repeatedly asserted that "no one ever imagined" a domestic airplane could be used as a weapon. How is this possible?
Their own physics research has established that only controlled demolitions are consistent with the near-gravity speed of fall and virtually symmetrical collapse of all three of the WTC buildings. While turning concrete into very fine dust, they fell straight-down into their own footprints.
These experts and scholars have found themselves obliged to conclude that the 9/11 atrocity represents an instance of the approach--which has been identified by Karl Rove, the President's closest adviser--of "creating our own reality."
These are serious questions posed by respected academics and ‘free thinking’ experts from some of the United States top Universities. With the protests against cartoons satirising the Prophet Muhammad sweeping the world, the Afghanistan and Iraq war, The war on terrorism, worse of all the rise in fanaticism from all sides, the inexorable polarization of viewpoints, what is it all leading to?
Certainly the erosion of ‘free speech’ and of ‘civil liberties’ and an increase in tension’s between the Islamic world and the West, worse this could lead to a horror that would make the last couple of wars seem like a ‘b-movie’ in comparison!

If ‘9/11’ was in anyway ‘manipulated’ by cynical forces from within the US administration then it is of up most urgency for the sake of the entire human race that the truth be exposed before it is to late.
Are we all being manipulated?
Back to top

PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 1:05 pm    Post subject: splitsinglecominattack Reply with quote

Defence analyst report:
Though a Western war against Iran will be a big geopolitical defeat for Russia and China, they cannot but resign themselves to this outcome if they are unable to convince the Iranians to accept the Russian proposal - ie uranium enrichment in Russia.

The Russians saw the writing on the wall when France, Germany and Britain began to march in lockstep with the United States. In particular, the widely but wrongly discounted nuclear belligerence of President Jacques Chirac last month implied that France was ready to accept the US use of nuclear weapons in a war against Iran if they saw fit to do so.

The somewhat standard scenario for this war - as indicated by Chinese and Russian war games - has the following features: An initial Israeli air attack against some Iranian nuclear targets, command and control targets and Shahab missile sites. Iran retaliates with its remaining missiles, tries to close the Gulf, attacks US naval assets and American and British forces in Iraq.

If Iranian missiles have chemical warheads (in fact or presumed), the US will immediately use nuclear weapons to destroy the Iranian military and industrial infrastructure. If not, an air campaign of up to two weeks will prepare the ground campaign for the occupation of the Iranian oil and gas fields.

Mass mobilization in Iraq against US-British forces will be at most a nuisance - easily suppressed by the ruthless employment of massive firepower. And Israel will use the opportunity to deal with Syria and South Lebanon, and possibly with its Palestinian problem.

The character of this war will be completely different from the Iraq war. No show-casing of democracy, no "nation-building", no journalists, no Red Cross - but the kind of war the United States would have fought in North Vietnam if it had not had to reckon with the Soviet Union and China.

Position Francais: Independant deterent nuclear:
France has secretly modified its nuclear arsenal to increase the strike range and accuracy of its weapons. The move comes weeks after President Jacques Chirac warned that states which threatened the country could face the "ultimate warning" of a nuclear retaliation.

A military source quoted yesterday by the Libération newspaper claimed France had tinkered with its nuclear weapons to improve their strike capability and make this threat more credible.

The source said there had been two major changes: the bombs can now be fired at high altitude to create an "electromagnetic impulsion" to destroy the enemy's computer and communications systems; and the number of nuclear warheads has been reduced to increase the missiles' range and precision.

During his surprise speech, which was made in January, President Chirac said: "The number of nuclear warheads has been reduced in certain of the missiles in our submarines".

Military experts said this was not a step towards disarmament, but a move to improve the performance of the weapons. Until now each submarine carried 16 French-made M45 missiles, each fitted with six nuclear warheads. After being fired, each warhead would separate to hit a different target, in effect giving each submarine 96 nuclear bombs.

In reducing the number of warheads, down to one per missile in some cases, the weapon is lighter and has a longer range. It can also be targeted more accurately.

Libération speculates that while potential targets are "secret", it is clear they include the Middle East or Asia, and that its military contacts suggest the changes are aimed at adding "flexibility" to France's nuclear deterrent.

"These evolutions are aimed at better taking into account the psychology of the enemy," defence minister Michèle Alliot-Marie said after President Chirac's warning in January.

In a speech to MPs, she added: "A potential enemy may think that France, given its principles, might hesitate to use the entire force of its nuclear arsenal against civilian populations.

"Our country has modified its capacity for action and from now on has the possibility to target the control centres of an eventual enemy."

French government sources said the president's speech, given at a nuclear submarine base in Brittany, was not targeted specifically at Iran - despite Tehran's decision to continue its nuclear programme - or at individual terrorist organisations, but at countries that posed a direct threat to France itself.

The paper says according to its information "ultimate warning" could take two new forms.

The most demonstrative would be to fire a relatively weak warhead into a deserted zone far from centres of power and habitation. The more radical option would be to explode a bomb at an extremely high altitude with the aim of creating a brief but enormously strong electromagnetic field which would disable or destroy all non-protected electronic systems in the area.

Be prepared. Sad
Back to top

PostPosted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 5:02 am    Post subject: openeyeswide Reply with quote

Daniel 2:43 "And just as you saw the iron mixed with baked clay, so the people will be a mixture and will not remain united, any more than iron mixes with clay."

Matthew 7: 15-17 "Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit."[/img]
Back to top

PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:09 pm    Post subject: letsortouthefactshallwe Reply with quote Rolling Eyes
Back to top

PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good topic! Very useful SmileSmile
Back to top

Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 58

PostPosted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 6:59 am    Post subject: re: home loans Reply with quote

Are these lyrics to an Underworld song?

You couldn't post us the music as well, could you?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 6:38 pm    Post subject: Music Reply with quote

Here is some great music with chill message. Know the band?
luvanpieces Cool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 18 Oct 2004
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 7:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Band is Cake
Song: Building A Religion

Fine video. Though hardly balanced.

And no, I don't want to get into a discussion about it, really.

After all, it's still the same old mindfuck, whichever side/faction/religion/race/haircut (etc etc you get the point) is trying to run things its way.

By the way, if anyone wants to check into how safe atom bombs and nuclear energy are, there are some great old US Info films available - copyright free at that! - from

Go on, get yer samplers out and have a laugh. "Plutonium and uranium are only mildly radioactive - AND THAT'S A FACT". Well, at least according to one gem from "Stay Safe Stay Strong" (1960). And don't forget to check out "Duck and Cover" while you're there. At least you'll be better prepared for when the Isrealis/Pakistanis/Indians/Americans/Brits/French/Russians/N.Koreans (ete etc you get the idea) decide to play silly buggers.

New Anti-NIREX project anyone?


Found these lyrics on the net.

We are building a religion,
We are building it bigger
We are widening the corridors and adding more lanes
We are building a religion.
A limited edition
We are now accepting callers for these pendant keychains
To resist it is useless,
It is useless to resist it
His cigarette is burning but it never seems to ash
He is grooming his poodle
He is living comfort eagle
You can meet at his location but you'd better come with cash

Now his hat is on backwards. He can show you his tattoos
He is in the music buisness he is calling you "DUDE!"

Now today is tomorrow and tomorrow's today
And yesterday is weaving in and out
And the fluffy white lines that the airplane leaves behind
Are drifting right in front of the waning of the moon

He is handling the money. He's serving the food
He knows about your party. He is calling you "DUDE!"

Now, do you believe in the one big sign?
The double wide shine on the boot hills of your prime
Doesn't matter if you're skinny. Doesn't matter if you're fat.
You can dress up like a sultan in your onion-head hat

We are bulding a religion. We are making a brand
We're the only ones to turn to when your castles turn to sand
Take a bit of this apple, Mr. Corporate Events
Take a walk through the jungle of cardboard shedies and tents
Some people drink pepsi. Some people drink coke. (coke)
The wacky morning d.j. says democracy's a joke.

He says now, "Do you believe in the one big song?"
He's now accepting callers who would like to sing along
He says, "Do you believe in the one true edge?"
By fastening your saftey belts and stepping towards the ledge

He is handling the money. He is serving the food.
He is now accepting callers. He is calling me "DUDE!"

Do you believe in the one big sign?
The double wide shine on the boot hills of your prime.
There's no need to ask directions if you ever lose your mind
We're behind you. We're behind you.
And let us please remind you
We can send a car to find you
If you ever lose your way

We are bulding a religion...
We are bulding it bigger...
We are building............... a religion.......
A limited edition
We are now accepting callers for these beautiful pendant keychains

Wink Wink
Chewing gum is television for the mouth - Lloyd Frank-Wright
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    UK Decay Forum Index -> In The UK Decay Today! All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 4 of 5

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group